RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03409
INDEX CODE: 135.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He receive a DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge
from Active Duty, reflecting the same amount of service shown on
his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22, Report of Separation
and Record of Service.
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The Record of Service entry (Block 9(b)) of his National Guard
Bureau (NGB) Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of
Service, shows nine years and eight months of service. He has
asked that he receive a DD Form 214 to reflect the same amount
of service. While he was in the Air National Guard (ANG) he did
perform come active duty. His current employer is asking that
he provide the requested forms.
The applicant has not provided any evidence in support of his
appeal.
Applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
_
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
A query of the Military Personnel Data System (MilPDS) has
yielded that the applicant began his military career on
22 January 1975. He was progressively promoted to the grade of
senior master sergeant effective and with a date of rank (DOR)
of 13 November 1997. He retired from the ANG on 20 December
2000.
________________________________________________________________
_
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The HQ Air Reserve Personnel Center received this application
for an advisory opinion on 22 October 2007. They forwarded it
to the HQ Air National Guard on 1 April 2008. To date, no
advisory has been received by this office.
________________________________________________________________
_
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has not exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. The
applicant has not provided evidence of actions on his part to
obtain the relief he seeks through the proper administrative
channels. The AFBCMR process is not intended as a substitute
for the proper utilization of established channels, such as the
local military personnel flight for the type of corrections he
seeks. Until such time as he has exhausted all available
administrative remedies, we find no basis to recommend granting
the relief requested.
________________________________________________________________
_
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
_
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2007-03409 in Executive Session on 25 September 2008,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. XXXXXXXXXXXXX, Panel Chair
Mr. XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, Member
Mr. XXXXXXXXXXXXX, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 Sep 07.
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00677
ANG Instruction (ANGI) 36-2002, Enlistment and Reenlistment in the Air National Guard and as a Reserve of the Air Force, states in cases of contractual errors, the Force Support Squadron (FSS) will process a case file to the National Guard Bureau (NGB) outlining the facts of the situation, along with the individual airmans desire, the commanders recommendation and the FSS comments and recommendation; and that the airman may petition the Board if they do not agree with the final decision. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01823
DPFP’s evaluation, along with attached correspondence from the -- ANG Chief of Staff and an e-mail trail between DPFP and the ANG Advisor to the Commander for 19th Air Force, is at Exhibit B. HQ AETC/DOF recommends the applicant not be reinstated into SUPT. DOF’s complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant notes that the National Guard Bureau (NGB) has...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01514
He had 4 years TIS and 3 years TIG at the time of his enlistment and other than the 3-level waiver, was fully qualified to be promoted to the grade of Senior Airman/E-4. A waiver was submitted, however the waiver was not timely approved because it lacked the necessary proof of certification. _________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: A majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence of error or injustice and recommends the application...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01507
On 31 July 2007, the commander notified the member that he was being discharged from the ANG under the provisions of AFI 36-3209, Separation and Retirement Procedures for Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve Members, Substandard (Unsatisfactory) Performance. On 31 July 2007, the applicant was honorably discharged from the MI ANG because he failed his end-of-course examination for his CDC twice. ___________________________________________________________ _____ The following members of...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2005-03591
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03591 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Block 24 of his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service, be corrected to show the award of the Soldier’s Medal. The applicant has provided documentation showing he was indeed awarded the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00586
He checked back in September and was told the FY05 guidance had been received and his reenlistment bonus would not increase. As he was improperly advised on the amount of the bonus and the timing of his reenlistment, he requests his contract be re-accomplished under the FY05 ANG Incentive Program and he be awarded the additional $10,000 he would have received had he waited to reenlist. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-01082
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01082 INDEX CODE: 128.08 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The separation pay he received be adjusted and paid to him as per the DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, dated 8 June 2000 indicates. On 28 June 2000, ANG/DPFOM requested the Air Reserve Personnel...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-00184
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00184 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) determination that he was fit for duty be changed and he be afforded the benefits given to military members involuntarily separated through the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03923
For over 4 years he could not be promoted to the grade of SMSgt by any military service with a ‘2’ EPR in his records along with a denial of reenlistment. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03580
Therefore, DPFOC specifically recommends denial of his request to reenlist, to be restored to the grade of TSgt, consideration for promotion to the grade of master sergeant (MSgt), and his request for a discharge certificate. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant's submission, we are not persuaded that his uncorroborated assertion of command retribution denying him reenlistment, in and by itself, sufficiently persuasive to override the rationale provided by the Air...